I believe that it would be unfair to say that the accuracy of the translation would be reduced if a team uses chinese subs. Some of the chinese subs are very accurate themselves as when translating, the meaning is kept intact, which is what I believe to be an important part of translation (You simply cannot translate a language word for word). "Although this inherently reduces the accuracy of the translation because of the fact it has gone through two translations." Translating from Chinese subs "inferior"? You gotta love how the size of the article went way up after an article about fansubbing was posted on Slashdot - PseudonympH 20:19, 2005 Feb 4 (UTC) Unless someone can verify that I'm wrong, I'm going to reword that remark. That's part of the controversy in the "indecency" fines, as there is no "official" definition of what's indecent or objectionable. I may be going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure there is no "official" ban on nudity by the FCC. 37 This article is too Japanese-centred.23 Merging Fansubs with Fan translation.11 Recent legal action lacking sources, filled with mistakes.10 What about a banned episode of Pokémon?.5.1 Extra sources to read and cite from.2 Translating from Chinese subs "inferior"?.it'ld help to get incredible sharp effect on anime sources wihtout too much blocking.
#Warpsharp video code
when i would have some time (in 2017, like vlad always say) i would code a SIMD block-based unsharp mask pros processing helper for ffdshow. for example, sharpening is great when used in postprocessing. and keep in mind that fast cpus (and they'll get faster and faster) can do incredible things in Post Processing, if your encode is clean enough. and moreover, anime DVD are often based on analogic sources, and they never denoise correctly ^^įifth, you should always look what the ENCODED result look like. because like Zarxrax said, you need to get rid of the noise of the MPEG-2 encoding process. (or when s3dc would be SIMDed, it'ld be damn fast too). a very sweet convolution3d or simple3dcleaneer if you have time, or faster a moderate PP. for very very clean HQ MPEG-2 DVD9, of course you wouldn't use heavy filtering. it's exactly what does the RV9 pre processing, and if we encode without, i think it's better to avoid this destruction, at least for bitrate over 600 kbps.įourth, OUTPinged is 50% wrong : you should _always_ filter anime sources. if you oversharpen it, it'll be more difficult to encode, and if you use heavy denosing + heavy sharpening, it'll be very modified. Third, OUTPinged_ is 50% right : filtering a clean source is not a good idea. with RV9 encodes, it's defendable, but for MPEG-4 (DivX,XviD or whatever) it's really bad. Second, using sharpening in pre processing is not a good idea. IMHO, it would be more interessing to see the result and not the diff. using subtract is a good idea to compare resamplers (comme tu l'as conseillé TSO) but here, it's really not a good idea : xsharpen and warpsharp are modifing the picture a lot.
#Warpsharp video cracker
So let's share my impressions on this topic :įirst, dark cracker (slt au fait ^^), your test is not good. (but not all !! you can, no you shoud use s3dc for movies ^^) I think my opinion might be interressing, as i encode anime only, and my filters are often designed for anime. I don't have make a compressibilty test (because i have actually no time) but i will edit these post as soon as possible to post the result. (these filters show the difference beetween the source and the picture filtered) I have make a screenshot of unfilter to show a "standard" sharp filter it was not designed for the anime but for the movie. Genrely to encode a anime u clean/smooth the source (with 2Dcleaner or smartSmoothHiQ or temporalsoften/temporalSmoother) an after u sharp the video to get more details. I have make some little screenshot with the different filter for sharp a video, i have made these tests for an anime, i think these can interested some people who generaly make some anime and don't realy know which sharp filter they must use.